|
Type Species |
(ZEBOV) |
1. |
Almost no antigenic cross-reactivity with Marburg virus, |
2. |
Virion length is about 970 nm as opposed to 790 nm with Marburg virus, |
3. |
Genome length of 18.9 kb as opposed to 19.1 kb with Marburg virus, |
4. |
Several gene overlaps as opposed to a single overlap with Marburg viruses, |
5. |
Glycoprotein expression involves transcriptional editing, |
6. |
Transcription of only the first ORF of gene four yields a soluble small glycoprotein not observed with Marburg virus, |
7. |
Protein profile distinct from Marburg virus; however, species-specific, |
8. |
Glycoprotein gene nucleotide difference of 57% compared with Marburg virus, |
9. |
Fatality rates for humans 50 to 90% with species Sudan Ebola virus and Zaire Ebola virus, respectively. Species Reston Ebola virus appears to be nonpathogenic for humans. |
List of Species Demarcation Criteria in the Genus
Virus species in the genus may be distinguished on the basis of their glycoprotein gene sequence differences (more than 30% amino-acid difference, see Table 2), cross-protection data (where available) and differences in geographic origins.
Official virus species names are in italics. Tentative virus species names, alternative names ( ), strains or serotypes are not italicized. Virus names, location and date of isolation ( ), genome sequence accession numbers [ ], and assigned abbreviations ( ) are:
|
Cote dIvoire Ebola virus |
(CIEBOV) |
|
Strain Cote dIvoire (Tai Forest, 1994); |
|
|
Reston Ebola virus |
(REBOV) |
|
Strain Reston (1989) |
|
|
Strain Philippines (1989) |
|
|
Strain Siena (1992) |
|
|
Strain Texas (1996) |
|
|
Sudan Ebola virus |
(SEBOV) |
|
Strain Boniface (1976) |
|
|
Strain Maleo (1979) |
|
|
Zaire Ebola virus |
(ZEBOV) |
|
Strain Mayinga (Zaire, 1976) |
|
|
Strain Zaire (Zaire, 1976) |
|
|
Strain Eckron (Zaire, 1976) |
|
|
Strain Tandala (1977) |
|
|
Strain Kikwit (1995) |
|
|
Strain Gabon (1994-1997) |
Tentative Species in the Genus
None reported.
Unassigned Viruses in the Family
None reported.
Phylogenetic Relationships within the Family
See Fig. 3.
Comparison of filovirus genomes with other Mononegavirales demonstrates a similar structure and suggests comparable mechanisms of transcription and replication. Comparative sequence analyses of single genes indicate that filoviruses are phylogenetically quite distinct from other families of the order Mononegavirales. Limited homology exists between the carboxy-terminal part of filovirus GP and the trans-membrane p15E-related glycoproteins of oncogenic retroviruses.
Ebola: from Ebola river in Zaire where one of the first registered outbreaks of the disease occurred.
Filo: from Latin filum, “thread”, to indicate the morphology of virus particles.
Marburg: from Marburg, town in Germany, where the first known outbreak of filovirus disease occurred and where filoviruses have been discovered.
|
|